Difference between revisions of "Talk:Executive Officer"
From NSV13
Jump to navigationJump to searchimported>Episkopos (→Five points of human resources management: new section) |
imported>Episkopos |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
They're overly wordy and prescriptive. They describe style of playing HoP to the exclusion of others. They're detached from the reality of how HoP is played on /tg/station. Nobody gives a shit about "the rights of crewmen". It shouldn't be a requirement to "support the captain". If they must stay, then I'm adding a note that they simply describe one style of playing HoP and are not absolute rules. Also, I'm taking out the weak attempts at humour. "You are not a dog" isn't even slightly funny. --[[User:Episkopos|Episkopos]] ([[User talk:Episkopos|talk]]) 18:53, 2 March 2014 (CET) | They're overly wordy and prescriptive. They describe style of playing HoP to the exclusion of others. They're detached from the reality of how HoP is played on /tg/station. Nobody gives a shit about "the rights of crewmen". It shouldn't be a requirement to "support the captain". If they must stay, then I'm adding a note that they simply describe one style of playing HoP and are not absolute rules. Also, I'm taking out the weak attempts at humour. "You are not a dog" isn't even slightly funny. --[[User:Episkopos|Episkopos]] ([[User talk:Episkopos|talk]]) 18:53, 2 March 2014 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I've moved it to a separate guide page, which is linked to in the heading. --[[User:Episkopos|Episkopos]] ([[User talk:Episkopos|talk]]) 21:42, 2 March 2014 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 14:42, 2 March 2014
Five points of human resources management
They're overly wordy and prescriptive. They describe style of playing HoP to the exclusion of others. They're detached from the reality of how HoP is played on /tg/station. Nobody gives a shit about "the rights of crewmen". It shouldn't be a requirement to "support the captain". If they must stay, then I'm adding a note that they simply describe one style of playing HoP and are not absolute rules. Also, I'm taking out the weak attempts at humour. "You are not a dog" isn't even slightly funny. --Episkopos (talk) 18:53, 2 March 2014 (CET)
I've moved it to a separate guide page, which is linked to in the heading. --Episkopos (talk) 21:42, 2 March 2014 (CET)
