Difference between revisions of "Talk:Executive Officer"

From NSV13
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Francinum moved page Talk:Head of Personnel to Talk:Executive Officer: Job Rename)
m (Francinum moved page Talk:Head of personnel to Talk:Executive Officer over redirect)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 18:54, 30 June 2020

Five points of human resources management[edit source]

They're overly wordy and prescriptive. They describe style of playing HoP to the exclusion of others. They're detached from the reality of how HoP is played on /tg/station. Nobody gives a shit about "the rights of crewmen". It shouldn't be a requirement to "support the captain". If they must stay, then I'm adding a note that they simply describe one style of playing HoP and are not absolute rules. Also, I'm taking out the weak attempts at humour. "You are not a dog" isn't even slightly funny. --Episkopos (talk) 18:53, 2 March 2014 (CET)

I've moved it to a separate guide page, which is linked to in the heading. --Episkopos (talk) 21:42, 2 March 2014 (CET)

Also the stuff about confirming with the appropriate department head is more a guideline for good practice than a rule. It is ultimately down to the HoP's own judgement what access they want to give out. --Episkopos (talk) 21:48, 2 March 2014 (CET)

    • I find it hilarious. Your sense of humor is not everyone's sense of humor. Bandit (talk) 23:31, 2 March 2014 (CET)
As you wish. --Episkopos (talk) 23:55, 2 March 2014 (CET)