Difference between revisions of "Talk:Executive Officer"
imported>Bandit |
m (Francinum moved page Talk:Head of personnel to Talk:Executive Officer over redirect) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
** I find it hilarious. Your sense of humor is not everyone's sense of humor. [[User:Bandit|Bandit]] ([[User talk:Bandit|talk]]) 23:31, 2 March 2014 (CET) | ** I find it hilarious. Your sense of humor is not everyone's sense of humor. [[User:Bandit|Bandit]] ([[User talk:Bandit|talk]]) 23:31, 2 March 2014 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::As you wish. --[[User:Episkopos|Episkopos]] ([[User talk:Episkopos|talk]]) 23:55, 2 March 2014 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:54, 30 June 2020
Five points of human resources management[edit source]
They're overly wordy and prescriptive. They describe style of playing HoP to the exclusion of others. They're detached from the reality of how HoP is played on /tg/station. Nobody gives a shit about "the rights of crewmen". It shouldn't be a requirement to "support the captain". If they must stay, then I'm adding a note that they simply describe one style of playing HoP and are not absolute rules. Also, I'm taking out the weak attempts at humour. "You are not a dog" isn't even slightly funny. --Episkopos (talk) 18:53, 2 March 2014 (CET)
I've moved it to a separate guide page, which is linked to in the heading. --Episkopos (talk) 21:42, 2 March 2014 (CET)
Also the stuff about confirming with the appropriate department head is more a guideline for good practice than a rule. It is ultimately down to the HoP's own judgement what access they want to give out. --Episkopos (talk) 21:48, 2 March 2014 (CET)
